I can always sharpen more at the end, but LR yielded a smoother looking image when you view 100%. I like, at least to start, my Lightroom Developed version. I did some screen shots from my 4K monitor. There appears to be too much sharpening which yields an overly crunchy image and what looks to be artificial, exaggerated grain. In a way, the results were disappointing. As another disclosure, I own and use periodically Dxo Photolab 4 and am pleased with the results when I use it.) I suppose the real answer is, it all depends on the nature of the original file. (Obviously, I'm not scaling images with DxO, only processing, but I find Gigapixel does an interesting job of optimizing the pixels that are there which is what DxO purports to do. I have found Topaz Gigapixel does a nice job massaging even ancient Olympus E10 4MP files and Canon D30 3MP files as well as 4MP 1D files, but I was curious what would happen with DxO. I decided to try it on an older 1Ds II files since they are about 1/3 the size of my R5 files. (It did a nice job on some R5 files shot when I was playing with my old Canon FD 500mm/f8 mirror lens adapted to the R5.) Generally, it did a credible job - at least on higher res files. So, I tried DxO Pure RAW for a couple of weeks.
0 kommentar(er)
